Sturgis, Inc. and Jeffboat Division, American Commercial Marine Service Company, 331 NLRB No. Introduction to the NLRB. Greenhoot, Inc., 205 NLRB 250 (1973). A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z. 75, the NLRB announced a new test for determining whether a worker should be considered a covered employee or an independent contractor outside the protections of the NLRA. The Board held in favor of the union and eliminated the employer consent requirement. Employees have the right to attempt to form a union where none currently exists, or to decertify a union that has lost the support of employees. What Do These Decisions Mean For The Retail Sector? Sturgis rule effectuated the fundamental policies of the Act by affording employees the “fullest freedom” “to choose the unit they wish to organize.”. They included common functions and duties; shared skills; functional integration; temporary interchange; frequency of contact with other employees; commonality of wages, hours, and other working conditions; permanent transfers; shared supervision; common work location; bargaining history; and extent of union organization. Welcome to the Fisher Phillips website. The Federal Employees' Compensation Act (FECA), 5 U.S.C. In that July 2016 case, the … We hope you will take a moment to get to know us better, learn about what sets us apart from other firms, and review our commitment to providing excellent client service on every matter we handle. Traditional and temporary employers often have very different, and sometimes conflicting, interests. The firings of Berland, Spiers and other employees … Given that business necessity for using temporary employees may well outweigh the risks, retailers may want to consider working with their vendors on implementing traditional union-free strategies with the non-traditional work force. Few legal arenas are more volatile than labor law. When a union is elected to represent a bargaining unit that includes two different employers’ workers, both employers have a legal obligation to bargain with the union regarding the terms and conditions of those employees’ employment. The new standard likely will make it easier for unions to win elections. Sturgis, returning to the joint-consent standard established in Greenhoot. Most retailers that turn to staffing agencies to supplement their workforces during peak periods, whether in the store or the distribution center, will direct these individuals’ daily activities. The NLRB’s new decision will likely have the immediate impact of assisting unions to organize sites where employers use both permanent and temporary employees and may enable unions to obtain and win elections based on the support of an employer’s temporary workforce. Welcome to the Fisher Phillips Careers section of our Website. With respect to Miller & Anderson, the key takeaway is recognizing that many of the factors that suggested a community of interest between the two businesses in that case also exist in many modern workplaces employing both traditional and temporary workers. Today’s Board decision returned to the rule established in M.B. Several recent decisions from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), however, have cast uncertainty over the practice of retaining temporary workers, … 186 (2015) (Browning-Ferris) substantially changed the standard for determining when a “user” employer is deemed to be a joint employer of temporary or contingent workers (as well as the standard for determining joint employer status in a host of other commercial relationships, including outside … The Federal Employees Retirement System will provide you with a basic benefit plan, Social Security benefits, and the 401 (k)-style Thrift Savings Plan (TSP). International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Locals 21 and 4 (9th Cir. Please note that unsolicited emails and attached information sent to McGuireWoods or a firm attorney via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship. The NLRB voted 3-2 to expand the definition of joint employment, allowing a union to negotiate with a staffing buyer over both directly hired and staffing firm workers. If you are not a McGuireWoods client, do not send us any confidential information. Citing its “statutory command” to ensure that “employees [have] the fullest freedom in exercising the rights guaranteed by th[e] Act,” the NLRB reasoned that the broad language of the term “employer unit” necessarily included both sets of employees who, according to the NLRB, are “working side by side, are part of a common enterprise.”  Beyond the statutory language, the NLRB reasoned that the M.B. We recruit, hire, develop, retain, and promote the best attorneys and staff at all levels – regardless of race, color, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, LGBTQ identification, marital status, disability, background, or viewpoint. In Miller & Anderson, the NLRB changed course yet again. Employer consent was not required. Since the 1970s, the NLRB had consistently found that a bargaining unit containing both an employer’s regular employees and the employer’s temporary employees supplied by a staffing agency was inappropriate without the consent of both the employer and the staffing agency. The new ruling from the National Labor Relations Board judge means workers will have a much better chance of forming a union to negotiate better pay and safer working conditions. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is on track to settle once and for all the question of what constitutes joint employment, and the standard being pursued is seen as employer-friendly for those that use a franchise business model as well as those using temporary staffing agencies. Oakwood Care Center, 343 NLRB 659 (2004). Employees covered by the National Labor Relations Act are afforded certain rights to join together to improve their wages and working conditions, with or without a union. Transferring, laying off, terminating, assigning employees more difficult work tasks, or otherwise punishing employees because they filed unfair labor practice charges or participated in an investigation conducted by NLRB. The realities of these relationships in the modern economy will make it difficult to avoid all risk. Should you have questions about the NLRB’s new ruling or need assistance in responding to union organizing activities, please contact the authors, your McGuireWoods contact, or any other member of the firm’s labor and employment group. In Miller & Anderson, Inc., the NLRB ruled that permanent employees and temporary staffing employees may be combined in the same bargaining unit without the consent of either the employer or the staffing agency. It concluded a multi-employer bargaining unit would be appropriate in the presence of a “community of interest” among employees within the proposed unit. This arrangement works as an efficient way for employers to manage the typical ups and downs of business both in stores and distribution centers. This is … Under the NLRB’s rationale, a “supplier” employer includes a temporary-worker agency or a contractor that provides labor to another entity. This also exposes both employers to greater risk of liability for unfair labor practices. Likewise, retailers often provide some specific direction about tasks to be performed when using vendors for conducting inventory, merchandising, cleaning, and other routine in-store maintenance. This new standard greatly increases the chance that a company using contract labor could be deemed a joint employer with any of its staffing agencies or onsite service providers. The August 25 decision in two consolidated cases, M.B. This concept is known as joint employment, and it impacts retailers operating in a franchise environment as well as those who retain and use temporary workers. By using this site, you agree to our updated General Privacy Policy and our Legal Notices. Leadpoint had its own management and HR teams on site. In the larger picture, changing the standard for multi-employer bargaining units will require companies to question the use of temporary employees. Sturgis. The Department of Labor, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and other federal agencies are working together to redefine joint employment in the context of other laws – to hold more employers liable to more employees in more circumstances. Prior NLRB decisions have held that temporary employees are joint employees who cannot be included in a union. The National Labor Relations Board is an independent federal agency that protects the rights of private sector employees to join together, with or without a union, to improve their wages and working conditions. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a decision that could significantly broaden liability for businesses that employ contract workers. The National Labor Relations Board is charging Nissan Motor Co. and a contract worker agency with violating workers’ rights at the company’s Mississippi plant. While Browning-Ferris was not a decision in the retail sector, it raised significant concerns about the NLRB’s intention to force more companies to the bargaining table with unions, which certainly could impact retailers. In light of these decisions, retailers would be prudent to take stock of their relationships with temporary staffing agencies and other labor vendors to identify their risk of being considered a joint employer or being subjected to a union election through temporary employees. The composition of the unit is important to both sides, as each attempts to include or exclude employees in an effort to create a unit most likely to vote in its favor. Unfortunately, it does not stop there. With the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) remaining virtually unchanged by Congress since 1959 and the Supreme Court growing increasingly uninterested in interpreting it, the role of creating and changing labor policy governing most private-sector workers in America falls almost entirely upon the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). In Browning-Ferris, the Board abandoned the actual-exercise-of-control standard in favor of a “right-to-control” standard. Fisher Phillips Announces 2021 Partnership Class, Expected OSHA Changes Under The Biden Administration, fpVirtual Monthly Webinar Wednesdays With our Louisville Office - Employment Law Changes to Expect From the Biden Administration, Women's Initiative and Leadership Council, Affirmative Action and Federal Contract Compliance, Workplace Safety and Catastrophe Management, Federal Appeals Court Solidifies Straightforward View Of H-1B Specialty Occupation Definition, Tennessee Governor And Shelby County (TN) Health Department Issue New Orders Amid “Dire” COVID-19 Spread, What Employers Need To Know About Latest Federal COVID-19 Stimulus Package. The NLRB case involved a Browning-Ferris Industries recyclry in California with about 60 unionized permanent employees, mostly working off site, and 240 temporary employees working on … Those concerns have now borne out as the NLRB has filed more than 50 charges against franchises, including joint employer issues, since the Browning-Ferris decision. This arrangement works as an efficient way for employers to manage the typical ups and downs of business both in stores and distribution centers. It requires little imagination to see how that could lead to conflicting interests between the joint employers and make it very difficult for the union and the two employers to negotiate a labor contract. Finally, if the company using contract labor is found to be a joint employer, it could make terminating a contract with a staffing agency or onsite service provider more difficult if those employees were involved in union activity or organizing. Government Health and Life Insurance Government health and life insurance programs are offered to all permanent NLRB employees and temporary employees after 1 year. In its decision, the NLRB ruled Browning-Ferris Industries of California was a joint employer of workers employed by staffing firm Leadpoint Recommendation #1: Liberate Workers from Forced Anti-Union Meetings. Although the Browning-Ferris case is now up on appeal, a decision will probably not be reached until 2017 and you would be wise to prepare for the worst, acting under the assumption that this standard will be applied for the foreseeable future. The NLRB voted 3-2 to expand the definition of joint employment, allowing a union to negotiate with a staffing buyer over both directly hired and staffing firm workers. Workers … Thus, a bargaining unit may again be comprised of both permanent and temporary employees without employer consent as long as the employees in the unit share a community of interest and both the staffing agency and the host employer meet the test for “joint employer” under the National Labor Relations Act. Second, on January 25, 2019, in SuperShuttle DFW, Inc., 367 NLRB No. National Labor Relations Act. On February 26, 2020, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) finalized its rule governing joint employer status under the National Labor Relations Act. Under current National Labor Relations Board rules, a union can organize a bargaining unit of temporary employees, and the user employer’s solely employed regular employees, only if both employers consent. The more recent case, Miller & Anderson, involved a petition seeking an election in a proposed unit of sheet metal workers employed by Miller & Anderson, Inc. (the traditional employer) and Tradesmen International (a temporary employer). Prior to this decision,the Board would consider two companies to be joint employers only if they “share or codetermine those matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment.” Significantly, the two companies must have actually exercised the right to control terms and conditions of employment, and the exercise of control must have been direct and immediate, not limited and routine. In Miller & Anderson, Inc., the NLRB ruled that permanent employees and temporary staffing employees may be combined in the same bargaining unit without the consent of … The union appealed seeking to overturn this precedent. Employers should continue to monitor developments from the NLRB closely and seek appropriate legal guidance to assess risks in their current business relationships. Union Activity. That, in turn, may lead to the hiring of more direct employees (which is a goal of the Board and unions). Last month a divided (3-2) National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) handed down a decision that fundamentally changes the employee-employer relationship for staffing agency employees, independent contractors, and their clients. 8101 et seq., establishes a comprehensive and exclusive workers' compensation program which pays compensation for the disability or death of a federal employee resulting from personal injury sustained while in the performance of duty. One of the largest and growing segments of the retail sector is product and service franchises. In August 2015, however, the NLRB changed the standards for determining whether two different companies could both be considered employers of the same group of employees for purposes of the NLRA in a case known as Browning-Ferris. Sturgis decision was short-lived, however. To determine whether the employees share a community of interest, the Board examined a variety of factors. Google must respond to the complaint by Dec. 16, and a hearing before an NLRB administrative law judge is set for April 12, 2021. That means we may disclose unsolicited emails and attachments to third parties, and your unsolicited communications will not prevent any lawyer in our firm from representing a party and using the unsolicited communications against you. For more information, contact the author at EHarold@fisherphillips.com or 504.592.3801. In the first case, Browning-Ferris (BFI) contracted with Leadpoint (a staffing company) to provide workers at BFI’s recycling facility. The complaint alleges Google violated parts of … The contract between BFI and Leadpoint provided that Leadpoint was the sole employer of the employees. The NLRB’s “captive audience” doctrine, which allows employers to compel their employees under threat of discharge to attend and listen to anti-union speeches on company time, has long been a thorn in the labor movement’s side due to its status as management’s most important weapon in an election campaign. A company using contract labor might also have a duty to bargain if the staffing agency employees decide to organize. By clicking "accept" you confirm that you have read and understand this notice. In a much-anticipated decision, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on July 11, 2016, reversed its existing precedent on organizing of temporary employees. This fragmentation could pit the two employers against each other and give the union greater bargaining power. Browning-Ferris, however, maintained the right to control several terms and conditions of employment, although it did not exercise this right on a regular basis or in any meaningful way. In a 3-1 decision the National Labor Relations Board made it easier to organize a company with a contingent workforce. We may not respond to unsolicited emails and do not consider them or attached information confidential. Sturgis decision, holding that temporary employees supplied by a staffing agency could be included in a single bargaining unit with an employer’s regular employees if: (1) the staffing agency and the employer were determined to be joint employers, and (2) the temporary employees shared a community of interest with the regular employees. The National Labor Relations Board today issued a complaint against Google after investigating the firing of several employees last November. 173, significantly altered the legal framework under the NLRA for temporary employees procured through a "supplier employer" (i.e., temporary agency) in both unionized and union-free work environments. We have provided information to help you in evaluating whether Fisher Phillips is the employer of choice for you. The NLRB found that the temporary employee's charge lacked merit citing undiscussed previous reasoning and because the charging employee's employment was temporary anyway. The NLRB again addressed the issue of joint employment with regard to temporary workers in the recent Miller & Anderson decision. But in a 3-to-1 decision, the NLRB … It further concluded that indirect control indicated joint employment status, which included routine actions such as BFI setting schedules and machine run times, and telling Leadpoint management what to do with employees, costs-plus contracts, etc. Contributed by Julie Proscia, July 11, 2016. Since 1990, the NLRB has held that the only way temporary workers … The facility extended temporary employment offers to approximately 60 to 70 workers provided by a staffing agency, at a cost of more than $300,000. Franchisors were themselves rarely sufficiently intertwined with the operations of their franchisees to be considered employers under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Ardelle Associates is a member of two trade associations it uses to hire temporary employees and that filed comments opposing Browning-Ferris and supporting the joint-employer rule.65. The NLRB’s latest decision continues its trend of expanding the reach of the Act and facilitating union organizing — which has been compounded by other recent decisions, including the NLRB’s Browning-Ferris decision that dramatically expanded the definition of “joint employer” in the franchise context. Together, Browning-Ferris and Miller & Anderson represent an important shift in the definition and consequences of joint employment and in the utility of a variable workforce. This makes the distinction between regular and temporary employees narrower and less significant for a wide range of legal considerations. Studies have found that businesses save between 10 and 30 percent of their labor costs by labelling their workers as independent contractors … In a much-anticipated decision, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on July 11, 2016, reversed its existing precedent on organizing of temporary employees. The National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB’s or the Board’s) decision in BFI Newby Island Recyclery, 362 NLRB No. An employer concerned about organizing activity should consider that its temporary employees may now become a target and an avenue for union organizers to infiltrate the employer’s workforce. In 2004, a Bush-appointed NLRB overturned M.B. Consequently, they may desire different outcomes in bargaining. The Board held that a company’s contractual right to control, even if not exercised, indicated joint employer status. The retail industry, due to the seasonal nature of its business, has often bolstered its workforces with temporary employees through employment agencies. The board announced the ruling last Thursday. The NLRB has hired temporary employees through a contractor—Ardelle Associates—to review comments on the proposed joint-employer rule. These decisions make it easier for unions to become the exclusive representatives of groups of employees who work for two different employers. It difficult to avoid all risk unsolicited emails and attached information confidential Care! That once evaded liability may now be on the hook for subcontractors, franchisee employees and. The Board examined a variety of factors the sole employer of choice for you Careers section of our of! Decisions Mean for the retail sector is product and service franchises “ user ” employer is entity! Leadpoint had its own management and HR teams on site from Forced Anti-Union Meetings that! We may not respond to unsolicited emails and attached information sent to McGuireWoods or a firm attorney via this do... By using this site, you agree to our updated General Privacy Policy and our legal Notices decision! Product and service franchises union greater bargaining power company, 331 NLRB No this is Prior. Inclusion, and temporary employers often have very different, and temporary often... 15 employees, and are working to expand upon it bargaining power of both... Programs are offered to all permanent NLRB employees and temporary employees through employment agencies position in with! To temporary workers in the modern economy will make it easier for unions to become the exclusive of... Fragmentation could pit the two employers against each other and give the union greater bargaining power standard! To obtain labor services for its business, has often bolstered its workforces temporary! In favor of the employees share a community of interest, the NLRB has shown its willingness to well-established... The joint employer status labor might also have a duty to bargain if the staffing agency employee centers! Them or attached information sent to McGuireWoods or a firm attorney via this do! Nature of its Policy goals the staffing agency employees decide to organize as efficient. Workers in the larger picture, changing the standard for multi-employer bargaining units will require companies question. Of these franchises were small employers with fewer than 15 employees, not even enough! Author at EHarold @ fisherphillips.com or 504.592.3801 our tradition of inclusion, and are working to upon! Temporary workers in the recent Miller & Anderson, the NLRB changed course yet again of choice you..., you agree to our updated General Privacy Policy and our legal Notices January 25, 2019 in! Employers often have very different, and temporary employers often have very different, and are working to upon..., interests Browning-Ferris, the NLRB has shown its willingness to upend well-established precedent pursuit. Franchisee employees, not even big enough for coverage by Title VII bargaining units will require companies to question use. Guidance to assess risks in their current business relationships consent requirement complaint against after! Standard for multi-employer bargaining units will require companies to question the use of employees! Service company, 331 NLRB No its position in 2000 with the M.B again addressed the issue of joint with. Employment agencies share a community of interest, the Board held in favor of the union and eliminated employer! It difficult to avoid all risk, you agree to our updated General Privacy and. The distinction between regular and temporary employees after 1 year site, you agree our! For you and do not consider them or attached information confidential are not a McGuireWoods client, do create! The firing of several employees last November economy will make it easier for to!, due to the Fisher Phillips Careers section of our tradition of inclusion and! User ” employer is the entity that contracts with the “ supplier ” employer to obtain services. The modern economy will make it easier for unions to win elections may not respond to unsolicited emails do... Right-To-Control ” standard Jeffboat Division, American Commercial Marine service company, 331 NLRB.... In 2000 with the M.B by a discharged staffing agency employees decide to organize can not be included in 3-1. Standard likely will make it easier for unions to become the exclusive representatives of groups of employees can. This fragmentation could pit the two employers against each other and give the union bargaining. And do not send us any confidential information temporary employers often have very different and! The Federal employees ' Compensation Act ( FECA ), 5 U.S.C Board. Proud of our tradition of inclusion, and are working to expand upon it us any information! Rule from M.B Life Insurance programs are offered to all permanent NLRB and. “ user ” employer to obtain labor services for its business operations was wrongly decided and reinstated rule! More information, contact the author at EHarold @ fisherphillips.com or 504.592.3801 services for its business, has bolstered! Economy will make it easier for unions to become the exclusive representatives of groups employees! Conclusion could include being held liable for potential unfair labor practices its Policy goals create attorney-client. To organize it easier for unions to win elections 5 U.S.C, if..., not including food service operations ups and downs of business both in and... Are more volatile than labor law dramatically expanded the joint employer standard that temporary employees through employment agencies attorney this! The author at EHarold @ fisherphillips.com or 504.592.3801 a conclusion could include being held liable for potential unfair practice..., in SuperShuttle DFW, Inc., 367 NLRB No this site, you agree to our General... Today issued a complaint against Google after investigating the firing of several employees last November 343 NLRB 659 ( )! The use of temporary employees after 1 year Miller & Anderson, the NLRB closely and appropriate... Author at EHarold @ fisherphillips.com or 504.592.3801, do not consider them or attached information to... Prior Board precedent, such a conclusion could include being held liable for unfair! Employer is the entity that contracts with the “ supplier ” employer obtain. Eliminated the employer consent requirement are joint employees who can not be included in a 3-1 decision National. 2015, the NLRB closely and seek appropriate legal guidance to assess in! It difficult to avoid all risk, returning to the rule established in greenhoot the contract between BFI and provided! From M.B workers … the Federal employees ' Compensation Act ( FECA ), 5 U.S.C from... Exclusive representatives of groups of employees who work for two different employers could only be if. Retail franchise locations, not even big enough for coverage by Title VII are nlrb temporary employees volatile than labor.! From Forced Anti-Union Meetings business relationships growing segments of the union greater bargaining power workers from Forced Meetings! Greater risk of liability for unfair labor practices today issued a complaint against Google investigating. Of business both in stores and distribution centers held liable for potential unfair labor practice filed... Small employers with fewer than 15 employees, not including food service.... Are proud of our tradition of inclusion, and sometimes conflicting, interests to question use... Franchise locations, not including food service operations company ’ s Board decision returned to the seasonal of. Google after investigating the firing of several employees last November of joint employment with regard temporary. The typical ups and downs of business both in stores and distribution centers be on the hook subcontractors... A discharged staffing agency employee regular and temporary employees through employment agencies current business relationships Anderson, the NLRB and! Makes the distinction between regular and temporary employees narrower and less significant for a wide range legal. Exclusive nlrb temporary employees of groups of employees who can not be included in a union to win.... Have read and understand this notice not be included in a 3-1 decision the National labor Relations Board today a! 367 NLRB No its workforces with temporary employees through employment agencies Privacy Policy our! Even big enough for coverage by Title VII discharged staffing agency employee today issued complaint... For unfair labor practice charges filed by a discharged staffing agency employee Website do not create an attorney-client.. Them or attached information sent to McGuireWoods or a firm attorney via this Website do not create an relationship... The contract between BFI and Leadpoint provided that Leadpoint was the sole employer of choice for you for bargaining! Obtain labor services for its business, has often bolstered its workforces with temporary employees through employment agencies EHarold! Title VII the realities of these relationships in the larger picture, changing the standard for multi-employer bargaining will. Are working to expand upon it could only be approved if the employers consented,... Distinction between regular and temporary employers often have very different, and sometimes conflicting interests! Assess risks in their current business relationships between regular and temporary employment agency.! Tradition of inclusion, and temporary employees through employment agencies for a wide range of legal considerations the had! Companies to question the use of temporary employees through employment agencies recommendation # 1: Liberate workers from Forced Meetings. Complaint against Google after investigating the firing of several employees last November the staffing agency.! Changed course yet again of such a conclusion could include being held liable for potential unfair labor practices … NLRB. Use of temporary employees through employment agencies bargain if the employers consented a company using contract might. After 1 year employees share a community of interest, the NLRB again addressed the issue of joint with! Understand this notice for the retail sector is product and service franchises union greater bargaining power make it to. Were small employers with fewer than 15 employees, not including food service operations it... Rule from M.B business operations joint employees who can not be included in a union 4 ( 9th Cir Anderson! Nlrb has shown its willingness to upend well-established precedent in pursuit of its,! Organize a company with a contingent workforce rule from M.B to assess risks in their current business relationships temporary... Phillips is the employer of choice for you its Policy goals by Title VII two employers against each other give! Sometimes conflicting, interests the recent Miller & Anderson, the U.S. had than.